<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	>

<channel>
	<title>primer Archives - The Historical Linguist Channel</title>
	<atom:link href="https://thehistoricallinguistchannel.com/tags/primer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thehistoricallinguistchannel.com/tags/primer/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2020 01:39:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.0.9</generator>
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">135321646</site>	<item>
		<title>The history of the English language &#8211; A syntactic primer</title>
		<link>https://thehistoricallinguistchannel.com/the-history-of-the-english-language-a-syntactic-primer/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-history-of-the-english-language-a-syntactic-primer</link>
					<comments>https://thehistoricallinguistchannel.com/the-history-of-the-english-language-a-syntactic-primer/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sabina Nedelius]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2020 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[English]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[syntax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HEL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[primer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[English syntax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[word order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[introduction]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thehistoricallinguistchannel.com/?p=1083</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Okay, so the plan was to continue with Old English syntax today. Then I started writing and realised that there were so many things that I should explain before looking closer at Old English syntax. So, today, we&#8217;re doing a syntactic primer! I&#8217;ll use this post to introduce you to the topic of syntax, which &#8230; </p>
<p class="link-more"><a href="https://thehistoricallinguistchannel.com/the-history-of-the-english-language-a-syntactic-primer/" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "The history of the English language &#8211; A syntactic primer"</span></a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://thehistoricallinguistchannel.com/the-history-of-the-english-language-a-syntactic-primer/">The history of the English language &#8211; A syntactic primer</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://thehistoricallinguistchannel.com">The Historical Linguist Channel</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>Okay, so the plan was to continue with Old English syntax today. Then I started writing and realised that there were <strong>so many things</strong> that I should explain before looking closer at Old English syntax. </p>



<h6 class="has-text-align-center"><strong>So, today, we&#8217;re doing a </strong>syntactic primer<strong>! </strong></h6>



<p>I&#8217;ll use this post to introduce you to the topic of <em>syntax</em>, which is basically the order of words and phrases used to create a well-formed sentence in any given language. </p>



<p>By doing so, I hope that you&#8217;ll be prepared for next week when we&#8217;ll look at Old English syntax!</p>



<h6 class="has-text-align-center">Okay, let&#8217;s get started.</h6>



<p>There are many kinds of word-order arrangements. In modern English, you use SVO-order in your sentences, meaning that you put your <strong>subject </strong>first, your verb next and last your <em>object. </em>So, for example, &#8220;<strong>I </strong>like <em>you</em>&#8220;. Simple enough. This is a very common structure (estimated to be used by approximately one-third of the world&#8217;s current languages).</p>



<p>Ever seen Star Wars? Even if you haven&#8217;t, you probably know that Yoda tends to use a different kind of order to structure his sentences. This order is usually showing a preference for OSV &#8211; meaning that the <em>object</em> comes first, then the <strong>subject</strong>, and lastly, the verb:  <em>You</em> <strong>I</strong> like.  Unlike SVO, this is a very uncommon structure and is actually the rarest of all word orders by a significant margin.  In a recent study by Hammarström (2016), in which 5252 languages were studied, only 0,3% had OSV-order, while 40,3% had SVO. </p>



<h6 class="has-text-align-center">There are others too :</h6>




<table id="tablepress-30" class="tablepress tablepress-id-30">
<thead>
<tr class="row-1 odd">
	<th class="column-1"></th><th class="column-2">Order</th><th class="column-3">Example</th><th class="column-4">Example of language</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody class="row-hover">
<tr class="row-2 even">
	<td class="column-1"></td><td class="column-2">Subject-object-verb</td><td class="column-3">I you like</td><td class="column-4">Japanese</td>
</tr>
<tr class="row-3 odd">
	<td class="column-1"></td><td class="column-2">Verb-subject-object</td><td class="column-3">Like I you</td><td class="column-4">Classic Arabic</td>
</tr>
<tr class="row-4 even">
	<td class="column-1"></td><td class="column-2">Verb-object-subject</td><td class="column-3">Like you I</td><td class="column-4">Malagasy</td>
</tr>
<tr class="row-5 odd">
	<td class="column-1"></td><td class="column-2">Object-verb-subject</td><td class="column-3">You like I</td><td class="column-4">Hixkaryana</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<!-- #tablepress-30 from cache -->



<p>Alright, so we&#8217;ve done a very basic overview of different word orders. There are two more things that we have to talk about:<strong> V2 </strong>and <strong>VF</strong>. </p>



<h6 class="has-text-align-center"><strong>That is, </strong>Verb second <strong>and </strong>Verb final.</h6>



<p>V2 is quite common in Germanic languages and works like this: a finite verb of a clause or sentence is placed in second position, with <em>one single</em> constituent preceding it. This constituent functions as the <em>clause topic</em>.  </p>



<p>Please note that this <strong>does not</strong> necessarily mean that there is only one <em>word </em>preceding the verb, but one <em>constituent </em>(that is, a word or a group of words that function as a unit in a hierarchical structure).  Anyway, V2 is still alive and well in many Germanic languages, for example in my native Swedish: </p>



<ol><li>Jag <strong>vet </strong>inte.                                I do not <strong>know</strong></li><li>Inte <strong>vet</strong> jag.                                 Do not <strong>know</strong> I</li></ol>



<p>Yeah, I know, the second example becomes <em>extremely </em>awkward in English but works just fine in Swedish<span id='easy-footnote-1-1083' class='easy-footnote-margin-adjust'></span><span class='easy-footnote'><a href='https://thehistoricallinguistchannel.com/the-history-of-the-english-language-a-syntactic-primer/#easy-footnote-bottom-1-1083' title='Swedish, it must be pointed out, does not always employ V2; the V2 condition holds in main clauses, but not in embedded clauses, which is furthermore true of most Germanic languages.'><sup>1</sup></a></span> . The point is, the verb <em>vet </em>(know) here does not change position, even though everything else does. Clearly, as you can see, that doesn&#8217;t work very well in English. </p>



<h6 class="has-text-align-center">But it used to! </h6>



<p>I just won&#8217;t tell you about how until next week. </p>



<p>Because we still have one more thing to deal with: <strong>VF</strong>. </p>



<p>Honestly, this pretty much means what you would expect it to: the verbs in a verb-final language almost always fall in final position. In German, for example, we see this happening in embedded clauses that follow a complementiser:</p>



<p><strong>dass     du           so         klug             bist</strong> <br />that       you        so         smart         <strong>are</strong><br />&#8220;that you are so smart&#8221;</p>



<h6 class="has-text-align-center">Again, awkward in English.</h6>



<p>But, again, it didn&#8217;t use to be! But we&#8217;ll get back to that too. </p>



<p>So, you know that Yoda&#8217;s language might not be all that odd (though rare)<span id='easy-footnote-2-1083' class='easy-footnote-margin-adjust'></span><span class='easy-footnote'><a href='https://thehistoricallinguistchannel.com/the-history-of-the-english-language-a-syntactic-primer/#easy-footnote-bottom-2-1083' title='Though &lt;a href=&quot;http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/002173.html&quot;&gt;Pullum&lt;/a&gt; has pointed out that it might be more accurate to consider Yoda&amp;#8217;s language as XSV, with occasional over-use of English stylistic variants.'><sup>2</sup></a></span> , that modern English generally use SVO word order<span id='easy-footnote-3-1083' class='easy-footnote-margin-adjust'></span><span class='easy-footnote'><a href='https://thehistoricallinguistchannel.com/the-history-of-the-english-language-a-syntactic-primer/#easy-footnote-bottom-3-1083' title='Though, of course, this might be slightly difficult to recognise, in, for example, questions. We&amp;#8217;ll get to that.'><sup>3</sup></a></span> , and that this wasn&#8217;t always the case. </p>



<p>I think that that is enough for us to dig into Old English next week. And, so, I leave you to mull things over until then. As always, if you want to know more, check out my references! </p>



<p style="color:#ffffff" class="has-text-color">.</p>



<h4 class="has-text-align-center">References</h4>



<p>Harald Hammarström. 2016. Linguistic diversity and language evolution. <em>Journal of Language Evolution</em>. 1: 1. pp. 19-29. DOI:  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/jole/lzw002">https://doi.org/10.1093/jole/lzw002</a> </p>



<p>Adrienne Lafrance. 2015. An unusual way of speaking, Yoda has. Hmmm? <em>The Atlantic</em>. <a href="https://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2015/12/hmmmmm/420798/">Find it here</a>.</p>



<p>Geoffrey K. Pullum. 2018.  Yoda&#8217;s syntax the <em>Tribune</em> analyzes; supply more details I will! <em>Language Log</em>. <a href="http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/002173.html">Find it here</a>.</p>



<p>Beatrice Santorini &amp; Anthony Kroch. 2007-. <em>The syntax of natural language: An online introduction using the Trees program.</em> <a href="https://www.ling.upenn.edu/~beatrice/syntax-textbook/">Find it here</a>. (I&#8217;ve primarily looked at <a href="https://www.ling.upenn.edu/~beatrice/syntax-textbook/ch14.html">Chapter 14</a> for this post).</p>



<p>Wikipedia. V2 word order. <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/V2_word_order">Find it here</a>. </p>



<p>Wikipedia. Word order. <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Word_order">Find it here</a>. </p>



<p>If you&#8217;d like a more comprehensive primer to syntax, I personally like:</p>



<p>Andrew Carnie. 2013. Syntax: A generative introduction. 2nd ed. Malden; Oxford; Victoria: Blackwell Publishin Ltd. </p>



<p>Jim Miller. 2008. <em>Introduction to English syntax</em>.  Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. </p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://thehistoricallinguistchannel.com/the-history-of-the-english-language-a-syntactic-primer/">The history of the English language &#8211; A syntactic primer</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://thehistoricallinguistchannel.com">The Historical Linguist Channel</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://thehistoricallinguistchannel.com/the-history-of-the-english-language-a-syntactic-primer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">1083</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
