<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	>

<channel>
	<title>pronunciation Archives - The Historical Linguist Channel</title>
	<atom:link href="https://thehistoricallinguistchannel.com/tags/pronunciation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thehistoricallinguistchannel.com/tags/pronunciation/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2019 19:32:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.0.9</generator>
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">135321646</site>	<item>
		<title>What&#8217;s with WH?</title>
		<link>https://thehistoricallinguistchannel.com/whats-with-wh/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=whats-with-wh</link>
					<comments>https://thehistoricallinguistchannel.com/whats-with-wh/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rebekah Layton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 May 2019 09:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive - Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[English]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weird spelling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pronunciation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voiceless labio-velar approximant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Old English]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[orthography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spelling]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thehistoricallinguistchannel.com/?p=738</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In many varieties of English, a W is a W. In these varieties, W sounds like [w] like in ‘wise’ and ‘wonderful’ and ‘wowza’ (unless it’s at the end like in ‘draw’ or ‘stow’, in which case it’s quiet as a mouse.) However, in Scottish, Irish, New Zealand, and certain American dialects, wh-words are pronounced &#8230; </p>
<p class="link-more"><a href="https://thehistoricallinguistchannel.com/whats-with-wh/" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "What&#8217;s with WH?"</span></a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://thehistoricallinguistchannel.com/whats-with-wh/">What&#8217;s with WH?</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://thehistoricallinguistchannel.com">The Historical Linguist Channel</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>In many varieties of English, a W is a W. In these varieties, W sounds like [w] like in ‘wise’ and ‘wonderful’ and ‘wowza’ (unless it’s at the end like in ‘draw’ or ‘stow’, in which case it’s quiet as a mouse.)<br></p>



<p>However, in Scottish, Irish, New Zealand, and certain American dialects, wh-words are pronounced a little different. In words like ‘which’ and ‘whale’, the H makes the W kind of&#8230;H-y. <br></p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter"><img data-attachment-id="739" data-permalink="https://thehistoricallinguistchannel.com/whats-with-wh/emphasizing-h/" data-orig-file="https://i0.wp.com/thehistoricallinguistchannel.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Emphasizing-H.gif?fit=245%2C169&amp;ssl=1" data-orig-size="245,169" data-comments-opened="1" data-image-meta="{&quot;aperture&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;credit&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;camera&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;created_timestamp&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;copyright&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;focal_length&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;iso&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;shutter_speed&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;orientation&quot;:&quot;0&quot;}" data-image-title="Emphasizing H" data-image-description="" data-image-caption="" data-medium-file="https://i0.wp.com/thehistoricallinguistchannel.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Emphasizing-H.gif?fit=245%2C169&amp;ssl=1" data-large-file="https://i0.wp.com/thehistoricallinguistchannel.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Emphasizing-H.gif?fit=245%2C169&amp;ssl=1" width="245" height="169" src="//i1.wp.com/thehistoricallinguistchannel.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Emphasizing-H.gif" alt="" class="wp-image-739"/></figure></div>



<p>Why is that? Why are those words even spelled with an H to begin with? As with many questions about the bitter rivalry between English pronunciation and English spelling, we have to look to the distant past…<br></p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter"><img data-attachment-id="740" data-permalink="https://thehistoricallinguistchannel.com/whats-with-wh/previously-on/" data-orig-file="https://i0.wp.com/thehistoricallinguistchannel.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/previously-on.jpg?fit=350%2C196&amp;ssl=1" data-orig-size="350,196" data-comments-opened="1" data-image-meta="{&quot;aperture&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;credit&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;camera&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;created_timestamp&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;copyright&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;focal_length&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;iso&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;shutter_speed&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;orientation&quot;:&quot;0&quot;}" data-image-title="previously on" data-image-description="" data-image-caption="" data-medium-file="https://i0.wp.com/thehistoricallinguistchannel.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/previously-on.jpg?fit=300%2C168&amp;ssl=1" data-large-file="https://i0.wp.com/thehistoricallinguistchannel.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/previously-on.jpg?fit=350%2C196&amp;ssl=1" loading="lazy" width="350" height="196" src="//i1.wp.com/thehistoricallinguistchannel.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/previously-on.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-740" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/thehistoricallinguistchannel.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/previously-on.jpg?w=350&amp;ssl=1 350w, https://i0.wp.com/thehistoricallinguistchannel.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/previously-on.jpg?resize=300%2C168&amp;ssl=1 300w" sizes="(max-width: 350px) 100vw, 350px" /></figure></div>



<p>Or, you know, the fairly old past—the Old English-y one. Old English inherited from Indo-European (with a few twists and turns through <a href="https://thehistoricallinguistchannel.com/once-upon-a-time/">Grimm’s Law</a>) a sound we linguists like to call a voiceless labiovelar approximant<sup>1</sup>. <a href="https://thehistoricallinguistchannel.com/the-international-phonetic-alphabet/">In IPA, [ʍ]</a>. That’s fancy language-people talk for a kind of voiceless W. In OE, this sound was spelled ‘hw’. ‘Which’ was ‘hwilc’ and ‘whale’ was ‘hwæl’. Perhaps the real poster child for this phenomenon is the first word of <em>Beowulf</em>: <strong>Hwæt</strong>! (ModE ‘what’)<br></p>



<p>During the Middle English period, the spelling of this sound was flipped to our modern ‘wh’, most likely due to the influence of French scribes who came to England with the Normans. It was also sometime during this period that some dialects began to see a merger between the pronunciation of ‘wh’ and plain old ‘w’. For a while, the merger was seen as uncouth, and educated speakers deliberately maintained the [ʍ] pronunciation of ‘wh’. Now, we find more dialects than not where the merger is complete and both spellings are pronounced [w]. But as mentioned before, there are several varieties of English where the original [ʍ] is hanging in there.<br></p>



<p>English has its share of strange, purely historic spellings, but this isn’t one of them. Your [ʍ] dropping friend isn’t mispronouncing ‘white’ or being pedantic; they’re just kicking it old school.</p>



<h4>Notes</h4>



<p><sup>1</sup>This sound is sometimes traditionally/erroneously called a labiovelar fricative.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://thehistoricallinguistchannel.com/whats-with-wh/">What&#8217;s with WH?</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://thehistoricallinguistchannel.com">The Historical Linguist Channel</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://thehistoricallinguistchannel.com/whats-with-wh/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">738</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
