<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	>

<channel>
	<title>thorn Archives - The Historical Linguist Channel</title>
	<atom:link href="https://thehistoricallinguistchannel.com/tags/thorn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thehistoricallinguistchannel.com/tags/thorn/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2019 20:05:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.0.9</generator>
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">135321646</site>	<item>
		<title>Ye Olde Poste of Ye New Year</title>
		<link>https://thehistoricallinguistchannel.com/ye-olde-poste-of-ye-new-year/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=ye-olde-poste-of-ye-new-year</link>
					<comments>https://thehistoricallinguistchannel.com/ye-olde-poste-of-ye-new-year/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sabina Nedelius]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2019 15:50:22 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[English]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orthography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle English]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[orthography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sabina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spelling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thorn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[palaeography]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thehistoricallinguistchannel.com/?p=545</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Welcome one and all to the Historical Linguist Channel &#8211; 2019 edition! This is our very first post of the year! Isn’t that wonderful &#8211; a new year of language fun! Today, we’ll be visiting merry old England and “ye olde” &#8211; specifically, we’ll be looking at one little word there: “ye”. You’ve probably seen &#8230; </p>
<p class="link-more"><a href="https://thehistoricallinguistchannel.com/ye-olde-poste-of-ye-new-year/" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "Ye Olde Poste of Ye New Year"</span></a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://thehistoricallinguistchannel.com/ye-olde-poste-of-ye-new-year/">Ye Olde Poste of Ye New Year</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://thehistoricallinguistchannel.com">The Historical Linguist Channel</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Welcome one and all to the Historical Linguist Channel &#8211; 2019 edition! </span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">This is our very first post of the year! Isn’t that wonderful &#8211; a new year of language fun!</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Today, we’ll be visiting merry old England and “ye olde” &#8211; specifically, we’ll be looking at one little word there: “ye”. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">You’ve probably seen it around, right? On pubs, restaurants, mills… The list can go on. But what if we told you, that this “ye” is based on a centuries-old confusion of two letters?</span></p>
<p><img data-attachment-id="547" data-permalink="https://thehistoricallinguistchannel.com/ye-olde-poste-of-ye-new-year/wait-what/" data-orig-file="https://i0.wp.com/thehistoricallinguistchannel.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/wait-what.jpg?fit=400%2C400&amp;ssl=1" data-orig-size="400,400" data-comments-opened="1" data-image-meta="{&quot;aperture&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;credit&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;camera&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;created_timestamp&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;copyright&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;focal_length&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;iso&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;shutter_speed&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;orientation&quot;:&quot;0&quot;}" data-image-title="wait what" data-image-description="" data-image-caption="" data-medium-file="https://i0.wp.com/thehistoricallinguistchannel.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/wait-what.jpg?fit=300%2C300&amp;ssl=1" data-large-file="https://i0.wp.com/thehistoricallinguistchannel.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/wait-what.jpg?fit=400%2C400&amp;ssl=1" loading="lazy" class="size-medium wp-image-547 aligncenter" src="https://i0.wp.com/thehistoricallinguistchannel.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/wait-what.jpg?resize=300%2C300&#038;ssl=1" alt="" width="300" height="300" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/thehistoricallinguistchannel.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/wait-what.jpg?resize=300%2C300&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/thehistoricallinguistchannel.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/wait-what.jpg?resize=150%2C150&amp;ssl=1 150w, https://i0.wp.com/thehistoricallinguistchannel.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/wait-what.jpg?resize=100%2C100&amp;ssl=1 100w, https://i0.wp.com/thehistoricallinguistchannel.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/wait-what.jpg?w=400&amp;ssl=1 400w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" data-recalc-dims="1" /></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">It’s true! The “ye” of “ye olde”, used to suggest a ‘merry, old time, showed up during the late 18th century and  hails from a scribal abbreviation used during Middle English and early Modern English. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">However, let us be clear: the scribal abbreviation was </span><b>not </b><span style="font-weight: 400;">(as far as we know) pronounced “ye”. In fact, it was actually pronounced as…</span></p>
<p><img data-attachment-id="548" data-permalink="https://thehistoricallinguistchannel.com/ye-olde-poste-of-ye-new-year/wait-for-it/" data-orig-file="https://i0.wp.com/thehistoricallinguistchannel.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/wait-for-it.jpg?fit=600%2C578&amp;ssl=1" data-orig-size="600,578" data-comments-opened="1" data-image-meta="{&quot;aperture&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;credit&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;camera&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;created_timestamp&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;copyright&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;focal_length&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;iso&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;shutter_speed&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;orientation&quot;:&quot;0&quot;}" data-image-title="wait for it" data-image-description="" data-image-caption="" data-medium-file="https://i0.wp.com/thehistoricallinguistchannel.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/wait-for-it.jpg?fit=300%2C289&amp;ssl=1" data-large-file="https://i0.wp.com/thehistoricallinguistchannel.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/wait-for-it.jpg?fit=525%2C506&amp;ssl=1" loading="lazy" class="size-medium wp-image-548 aligncenter" src="https://i0.wp.com/thehistoricallinguistchannel.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/wait-for-it.jpg?resize=300%2C289&#038;ssl=1" alt="" width="300" height="289" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/thehistoricallinguistchannel.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/wait-for-it.jpg?resize=300%2C289&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/thehistoricallinguistchannel.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/wait-for-it.jpg?w=600&amp;ssl=1 600w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" data-recalc-dims="1" /></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">“the”! Not as much fun as you expected? And now, you’re probably sitting there, wondering how the h*ck that happened, right? Well, during <a href="https://thehistoricallinguistchannel.com/old-english-aint-shakespeare-feat-dinosaurs/">Middle English</a>, and for a little while during early Modern English, English had a letter called </span><i><span style="font-weight: 400;">thorn</span></i><span style="font-weight: 400;">. Thorn was originally a rune, pronounced as either a voi</span><span style="font-weight: 400;">celess or voiced dental fricative, that is [</span><span style="font-weight: 400;">θ] or [ð]. Today, you find these sounds in words like “thing” (British English </span><span style="font-weight: 400;">[</span><span style="font-weight: 400;">θɪŋ]</span><span style="font-weight: 400;">) and </span><span style="font-weight: 400;">“the” (British English [ðə]). </span><span style="font-weight: 400;">In writing, though, it looked like this: </span><span style="font-weight: 400;">þ.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Now, for a rather long period of time, in cursive writing, it was common for scribes to write  “the” by using thorn with an &lt;e&gt; placed above it, like this:</span></p>
<p><img data-attachment-id="546" data-permalink="https://thehistoricallinguistchannel.com/ye-olde-poste-of-ye-new-year/thorn/" data-orig-file="https://i0.wp.com/thehistoricallinguistchannel.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/thorn.png?fit=320%2C747&amp;ssl=1" data-orig-size="320,747" data-comments-opened="1" data-image-meta="{&quot;aperture&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;credit&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;camera&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;created_timestamp&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;copyright&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;focal_length&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;iso&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;shutter_speed&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;orientation&quot;:&quot;0&quot;}" data-image-title="thorn" data-image-description="" data-image-caption="" data-medium-file="https://i0.wp.com/thehistoricallinguistchannel.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/thorn.png?fit=129%2C300&amp;ssl=1" data-large-file="https://i0.wp.com/thehistoricallinguistchannel.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/thorn.png?fit=320%2C747&amp;ssl=1" loading="lazy" class="wp-image-546 aligncenter" src="https://i0.wp.com/thehistoricallinguistchannel.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/thorn.png?resize=46%2C107&#038;ssl=1" alt="" width="46" height="107" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/thehistoricallinguistchannel.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/thorn.png?resize=129%2C300&amp;ssl=1 129w, https://i0.wp.com/thehistoricallinguistchannel.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/thorn.png?w=320&amp;ssl=1 320w" sizes="(max-width: 46px) 100vw, 46px" data-recalc-dims="1" /></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Okay, so you know that this is actually a thorn with an &lt;e&gt; above it, so you know that this is a “the”. But see the very thin line at the top of the thorn below the &lt;e&gt;? This line is not always visible in the manuscripts: perhaps it was sometimes not written or perhaps time has taken it from us. Point is: occasionally, it may be exceedingly difficult to determine whether a letter is a thorn or a y. And someone kinda messed up and said that this, this little abbreviation, is spelled “ye” in modern English, and the mistake stuck! </span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">So do like the HLC and smile a bit the next time you pass a “ye olde pub”, knowing that they have decided to print a huge spelling mistake on their wall. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Enjoy the knowledge and welcome back to the HLC!</span></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://thehistoricallinguistchannel.com/ye-olde-poste-of-ye-new-year/">Ye Olde Poste of Ye New Year</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://thehistoricallinguistchannel.com">The Historical Linguist Channel</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://thehistoricallinguistchannel.com/ye-olde-poste-of-ye-new-year/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">545</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
