<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Unknown etymology Archives - The Historical Linguist Channel</title>
	<atom:link href="https://thehistoricallinguistchannel.com/tags/unknown-etymology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thehistoricallinguistchannel.com/tags/unknown-etymology/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Jan 2020 19:24:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.0.9</generator>
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">135321646</site>	<item>
		<title>Fun Etymology Tuesday &#8211; Abaft</title>
		<link>https://thehistoricallinguistchannel.com/fun-etymology-tuesday-abaft/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=fun-etymology-tuesday-abaft</link>
					<comments>https://thehistoricallinguistchannel.com/fun-etymology-tuesday-abaft/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sabina Nedelius]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2020 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germanic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fun Etymology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unknown etymology]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thehistoricallinguistchannel.com/?p=1580</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Another Tuesday = another Fun Etymology! Today&#8217;s word is abaft! Slightly unusual in modern English (estimated by the OED to occur between 0.1 to 1.0 times per million words, nowadays mostly used in nautical terminology), this word, in its current form, is recorded from the late 16th century. However, before that, we still see it &#8230; </p>
<p class="link-more"><a href="https://thehistoricallinguistchannel.com/fun-etymology-tuesday-abaft/" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "Fun Etymology Tuesday &#8211; Abaft"</span></a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://thehistoricallinguistchannel.com/fun-etymology-tuesday-abaft/">Fun Etymology Tuesday &#8211; Abaft</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://thehistoricallinguistchannel.com">The Historical Linguist Channel</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>Another Tuesday = another Fun Etymology! </p>



<h6 class="has-text-align-center"><strong>Today&#8217;s word is </strong>abaft!</h6>



<p>Slightly unusual in modern English (estimated by the OED to occur between 0.1 to 1.0 times per million words, nowadays mostly used in nautical terminology), this word, in its current form, is recorded from the late 16th century.  </p>



<p>However, before that, we still see it in slightly different forms. </p>



<p>A native Germanic word, <em>abaft</em> comes from Middle English <em>on baft</em>, meaning &#8220;back, behind, to the rear&#8221;, from Old English <em>on bæftan</em>.  Today, it refers to something toward the back of a ship (or at least something farther back than you currently are). </p>



<p>As I am sure you remember, I&#8217;ve previously talked about the element <em>a-</em> when it occurs in words such as these, to mean something like &#8220;on, in, into&#8221;, which indeed also appears to be true here<span id='easy-footnote-1-1580' class='easy-footnote-margin-adjust'></span><span class='easy-footnote'><a href='https://thehistoricallinguistchannel.com/fun-etymology-tuesday-abaft/#easy-footnote-bottom-1-1580' title='Though the &lt;em&gt;a&lt;/em&gt;&amp;#8211; prefix might also come from Latin &amp;#8211; then meaning &amp;#8220;away&amp;#8221; &amp;#8211; or from Greek &amp;#8211; then meaning &amp;#8220;not, without&amp;#8221;.'><sup>1</sup></a></span>.</p>



<h6 class="has-text-align-center">But what about <em>baft?</em></h6>



<p>Well, <em>baft</em> is actually a compound of two other words: <em>be</em>, meaning &#8216;by&#8217;, and  <em>æftan</em>, meaning &#8216;aft&#8217;. </p>



<p>Old English<em> be</em> is Germanic too. From Proto-Germanic <em>*bi</em> and PIE *<em>bhi</em>,  it came to be used as an adverb during Middle English, meaning &#8220;near&#8221; or &#8220;close at hand&#8221;. </p>



<p>Old English <em>æftan</em> is slightly more tricky. Although all the Germanic languages appear to have a similar word, the ultimate origin remains disputed. </p>



<p>We know that <em>æftan </em>shows a derivative form with a Germanic adverbial suffix. We also know that it is from the Germanic base of Gothic <em>afta</em>, but then&#8230; Things kinda stop. </p>



<p>It might be a suffixed form of the Indo-European base of an ancient Greek word (<em>ἐπί</em>), and might thus be the only non-Germanic element of <em>abaft</em>, but that remains disputed. </p>



<p>And that is our Fun Etymology for today!</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://thehistoricallinguistchannel.com/fun-etymology-tuesday-abaft/">Fun Etymology Tuesday &#8211; Abaft</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://thehistoricallinguistchannel.com">The Historical Linguist Channel</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://thehistoricallinguistchannel.com/fun-etymology-tuesday-abaft/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">1580</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
